Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:12
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Buffett Donates $6 Billion in Berkshire Stock to 5 Charities in Annual Gift - Barron's
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Oakmont caddies look to fill roles during U.S. Open, on and off the bag - TribLIVE.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What should I do to stop being angered easily?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
10 Albums Out This Week You Should Listen to Now - Pitchfork
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Nemo harum distinctio cupiditate soluta nesciunt beatae harum.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.